Thursday, August 13, 2020
Home > Analysis & Opinions > Uganda @55: Economy Largely Dependent On Foreign Companies
Analysis & OpinionsFeatured

Uganda @55: Economy Largely Dependent On Foreign Companies

In the run up to Uganda’s 55th independence anniversary celebrations scheduled for October 9, 2017, Business Focus will be running stories about the economic progress the East African country has made.

Uganda attained independence from Britain on October9, 1962. And to attain full economic independence, the then President Idi Amin expelled foreigners especially from Asia in 1972 and nationalized their businesses.

However, 55 years later, economic independence remains a distant dream.

The country not only largely depends on foreign imported goods, but also much of the country’s tax revenue comes from foreign owned companies.

For example, in 2016, Uganda spent US$4,325.66m (about Shs15.5 trillion) on imports, down from US$4,955.39m (about Shs17.8 trillion) in 2015.

On the contrary, Uganda earned US$2,921.25m (about Shs10.5 trillion) in 2016, up from US$ 2,667.19m (Shs9.6trillion) in 2015.

Additionally, Uganda has continued to borrow largely from external sources to finance her budget.

Uganda’s public debt has increased to Shs34trillion according to the ‘State of the Economy June 2017’ report released by the Bank of Uganda (BoU).

“The provisional total public debt stock (at nominal value) as at end May 2017 stood at Shs34.0 trillion, an increase of 14.1 per cent relative to June 2016 and 16.7 per cent in the same period a year ago. It comprised Shs21.1 trillion (USD 5.7 billion) in external debt, commanding a dominant share of 62.4 per cent of the total public debt, and Shs12.7 trillion in domestic debt,” the report obtained by Business Focus reads in part.

This money is largely used to finance huge infrastructural projects like roads and dams that are also constructed by foreign companies.

Worse still, in 55 years, Uganda hasn’t nurtured many strong indigenous companies to support the economy; it is literally surviving on the mercy of foreign owned companies.

In early 2016, President Yoweri Museveni released a list of Uganda’s top 100 tax payers and a close analysis indicates that over 90% were foreign owned.

This means the figures used were for 2015. Key sectors of the economy including banking, telecommunications and manufacturing are all dominated by foreign owned companies.

That’s not to say these companies are bad. They employ many Ugandans and pay taxes. In fact, when they post profits, they pay 30% in Capital Gains Tax.

Thereafter, they are at liberty to do whatever they want with the money including repatriating profits.

All the top 10 tax payers are foreign owned and these are the most profitable companies in the country     .

These include MTN Uganda Limited (South Africa), Nile Breweries Ltd (South Africa), Airtel Uganda Limited (India), Uganda Breweries Ltd (Kenya), Stanbic Bank (U) Ltd (South Africa), Tororo Cement Ltd (Kenya), Century Bottling Co. Ltd (United States), Bujagali Energy Limited (Switzerland), Kakira Sugar Limited and Umeme Limited.

The challenge with foreign owned companies is that they can easily relocate their business to better markets.

For example, Global brands that have been operating in Uganda for many years such as AON, AIG and British Airways have all quit, citing a small market (inadequate demand).

The failure by Uganda to build strong ingenious companies in 55 years leaves a lot to be desired.

In banking sector, all major banks are foreign owned. Out of 24 banks operating in Uganda, only three including Centenary Bank, Housing Finance Bank and Finance Trust Bank are locally owned.

The three systemically important banks; Stanbic, Standard Chartered and dfcu Bank are foreign owned.

A systemically important bank is one whose failure might trigger a financial crisis. They are colloquially referred to as “too big to fail”.

The problem with this kind of structure is that these banks become like a cartel so much that they dictate the market. Unlike in Kenya where government capped interest rates because majority banks are indigenous, such a policy may be hard to implement in Uganda where majority banks are foreign owned.

Shockingly, history shows Uganda hasn’t made efforts to support and grown indigenous banks.

Crane Bank, National Bank of Commerce, Co-operative Bank,, Greenland Bank, Teefe Bank and Gold Trust Bank have all collapsed without much effort to save them. International Credit Bank was also closed. Uganda Commercial Bank was sold to Stanbic while Barclays Bank acquired Nile Bank Uganda Limited in 2007.

In conclusion, Uganda doesn’t have a clear policy on how to nurture, grow and sustain indigenous companies. The recent Buy Uganda, Build Uganda (BUBU) policy is a step in the right direction, but more needs to be done in reducing the cost of doing business if local companies are to compete with imported goods. More importantly, government has concentrated its efforts on wooing foreign investors at the expense of potential local investors.

Many successful local investors haven’t received much government support.

This state of affairs raises one key question: Was Uganda’s independence hurried?

  • 14
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
Taddewo William Senyonyi
https://www.facebook.com/senyonyi.taddewo
William is a seasoned business and finance journalist. He is also an agripreneur and a coffee enthusiast.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *